Vena vs Cube for teams that stay in Excel
Workflow, versioning, and audit history against a logged spreadsheet publish.
Vena’s 26 Aug 2026 consolidation post cites its 2026 FP&A Impact Report: 90% of finance professionals surveyed still use Microsoft Excel for modeling and reporting. The shortlist fails when that 90% is treated as one job. On 4 Oct 2026 Cube’s spreadsheet page still described a fetch into an existing template and a publish that writes the edit back.
Keeping the spreadsheet is not the same replacement. The 26 Aug 2026 post names workflow, versioning, period locking, entity-level security, audit history, and data provenance. Cube’s spreadsheet page names a fetch into the template and a publish logged with before and after values.
Overview
| Primary use case | Planning, consolidation, and close, with workflow, versioning, and audit history on the governed record | Planning, forecasting, and reporting from one governed model, with a logged publish |
|---|---|---|
| Day-to-day workflow | A Contributor moves through workflows and adds inputs. A Power User manages the model. View Only reviews reports and can open workflows | Fetch pulls values into the template. Publish writes the edit back and logs before and after. AI Hub routes a question to an agent team. The Planner Agent saves a new scenario |
| Main buying consideration | Whether the order is Professional or Complete, and whether Financial Consolidation is the independent product named on 26 Aug 2026 | Which of Bronze, Silver, or Gold is on the quote |
Vena’s security page describes a cloud platform and annual SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II audits conducted by Deloitte. Cube’s security page says the service runs on Amazon Web Services, with a SOC 2 Type II examination by Dansa D’Arata Soucia, and states HIPAA compliance. Cube’s pricing footer also prints SOC 1.
We reviewed Vena’s pricing page, Excel product page, security page, and 26 Aug 2026 consolidation post, and Cube’s pricing page, spreadsheet page, security page, and the help article updated 6 Jul 2026.
Vena

Cube

Editions and pricing
On 4 Oct 2026 neither public pricing page showed a figure with currency, unit, period, commitment, and included product, so this page states no amount.
| How it is sold | Two named plans, Professional and Complete. License types on the same page are Power User, Contributor, and View Only. The glossary says import APIs are included and export APIs carry an additional fee. No amount is printed | Three named plans, Bronze, Silver, and Gold, each behind a custom quote. Premium Support+ is an add-on on any plan. The 6 Jul 2026 help article describes an AI credit balance and admin top-ups, with no credit price |
|---|---|---|
| Names on the public page | Professional includes the platform, a Customer Success Manager, Standard Support, the Customer Portal, and Vena AI. Complete is that set plus Vena Insights, Premium Support, a sandbox, and Expert Managed Services | Bronze’s included list is platform access, custom roles, unlimited dimensions and users, and unlimited dashboards. Silver’s list adds Slack and Teams, workflow automation, PowerPoint and Slides, and MCP integration. Gold’s heading names premium support and custom modules; the included bullets shown match Silver |
| What moves the order | A Power User manages the model. A Contributor works inside workflows and adds inputs. View Only reviews reports and can open workflows. Financial Consolidation, generally available 26 Aug 2026, can be purchased independently. The pricing page does not name that product inside Professional or Complete | A block on the pricing page says FP&Agents across four teams, Data Managers, Analysts, Planners, and Business Partners, plus the MCP server, on every tier. Bronze’s included bullets do not repeat the MCP line. This page does not treat that shorter list as proof the every-tier sentence is void |
| Main buying consideration | Count Power Users separately from Contributors and View Only, and ask whether the 26 Aug 2026 consolidation product is on the order by itself | Ask which plan is quoted, and read the Bronze, Silver, and Gold bullets |
Workflow
Vena’s pricing page is the control for who touches the model. Cube’s help article updated 6 Jul 2026 is the control for task reminders, the Planner Agent, and who may run Charlie. Shared words such as workflow are overlap, not a shared permission model.
| Who moves the work | Contributor: navigate workflows and add inputs. Power User: manage the financial model. The 26 Aug 2026 post adds workflow around consolidation, including intercompany eliminations, currency translation, ownership structures, and top-side adjustments | The help article says workflow enhancements are available for all customers: one summary email when tasks are assigned, a reminder 2 days before a task is due, and a reminder every 3 days while it is overdue. Silver and Gold included lists also name Workflow Automation |
|---|---|---|
| What an agent may change | Professional’s included list names Vena AI. The 26 Aug 2026 post says that, at general availability, Vena AI uses trusted financial data and consolidation context inside Vena’s permissions and workflows. Vena Omega is described on that post as later work, not as a current control | AI Hub routes a plain-language question to an agent team. Charlie, the renamed AI Analyst, needs Use Charlie. The Planner Agent needs Use AI Planner, saves a new scenario under Planner Scenarios, and does not modify Budget, Forecast, or Actuals. MCP write-back is a separate permission, and an AI write lands only on a scenario the AI created or one opened for AI write-back |
| What is gated | The 26 Aug 2026 post names entity-level security, period locking, and versioning on the consolidation process | Fetch and publish rights follow the saved report. Data Access Scope still applies to Charlie: a scenario the user cannot open is a scenario Charlie cannot read. Assumptions in the Planner are tagged User or AI |
| Main buying consideration | Whether contributors must move through a workflow that includes period locking and entity-level security, as named on the 26 Aug 2026 post | Whether the quote’s plan is enough for Slack, Teams, and workflow automation, and which of Use Charlie, Use AI Planner, and MCP write-back an admin will grant |
Audit history and the publish log
The 26 Aug 2026 post is Vena’s dated list of close controls. Cube’s spreadsheet page is the dated description of the publish log, and the 6 Jul 2026 help article adds the undo limits and the AI write flag. A control named on one of those pages is not proof the other product lacks it.
| What the record stores | Audit history and native data provenance on the 26 Aug 2026 post: where data came from, which rules and adjustments were applied, what changed, and how the consolidated result was produced. The Excel product page names activity tracking and audit trails. The Microsoft 365 page names drill saves for who entered a value and when | The spreadsheet page: every publish is permission-gated, logged with before and after values, and undoable. A multi-range publish on the 6 Jul 2026 help article produces one grouped audit entry. An MCP write is attributed to the user and flagged as AI-originated in the audit trail |
|---|---|---|
| Reversal and lock | Versioning and period locking, named on the 26 Aug 2026 post. That post does not describe an undo-publish action | Undo Publish, on the 6 Jul 2026 help article, reverses the user’s own publish only when a later publish, import, or system event has not changed the data. Write-protected scenarios block undo |
| Trace to source | Data provenance on the consolidation post, from source data through translation, eliminations, and adjustments | Drilldown from a fetched value to the transactions behind it, on the spreadsheet page. The Planner’s Analysis tab traces a figure to the data it came from |
| Main buying consideration | Whether the close has to include the 26 Aug 2026 set: workflow, versioning, period locking, entity-level security, audit history, and data provenance | Whether the requirement is a publish log with before and after values, undo under those limits, and an AI write flagged in the same trail |
Favor Vena when the documented requirement is the 26 Aug 2026 post: workflow, versioning, period locking, entity-level security, audit history, and data provenance. Favor Cube when the documented requirement is the spreadsheet page’s publish, permission-gated and logged with before and after values, undoable only inside the 6 Jul 2026 limits.
FAQs
Which documented requirement favors Vena?
Favor Vena when the close has to include the controls named on the 26 Aug 2026 post: workflow, versioning, period locking, entity-level security, audit history, and data provenance. That post also says Financial Consolidation can be purchased independently.
Which documented requirement favors Cube?
Favor Cube when the requirement is a publish that is permission-gated and logged with before and after values, with Undo Publish limited as the 6 Jul 2026 help article describes.
Is Vena Financial Consolidation included in Professional?
The pricing page does not place Financial Consolidation inside Professional or Complete. The 26 Aug 2026 post says it can be purchased independently, and that organizations already using Vena for planning can connect consolidated actuals in the same environment.
Does a control on one page mean the other product lacks it?
No. Vena’s 26 Aug 2026 post names period locking. That silence is not a finding that Cube has no lock. Cube’s help article names Undo Publish. Vena’s 26 Aug 2026 post names versioning and does not describe that undo action.